Top-rated luxury guide on essay writing for students and kids!
Dear Thomas Friedman, your economic development plan for the US is actually good in terms of liaises-fair economy but some parts of it need specific attention for its better implementation. Your idea about the America’s core competency and strategic advantage that is expressed in the ability to attract, develop and unleash creative talented leader, need further investigation as to what methods should be applied for focusing on strategic aims that currently the US government has. Of course it is much more important the outcomes that will affect the society, not the results of the elections and here it is necessary to view historical background of capitalism evolvement.
Read the attached editorial, “The Tea Kettle Movement” by Thomas Friedman (New York Times, September 28, 2010). Pretending you are Adam Smith and then Karl Marx, write your own letters to the editor (no more than 500 words each), assessing Freidman’s economic plan for the United States. Be sure to assess Friedman’s plan and not the “Tea Party Movement” he is criticizing, although you may also want to comment on the latter too. When you write your two letters, you should refer to the texts we have read from Smith and from Marx and Engels as well as to Friedman’s editorial.
To what magnitude does our surroundings hinder who we turn? This is some of the inquires that have already captivated the interest of sociologists and personality professionals from a long time and still the best solution is incomplete and confusing. A good appearance of scientific studies are keen to think that in a socializing experience, individuals acquire societies, traits and habits all the way through individuals that subsequently define who they to become (O'Connor, Campbell and Freeley 2012). It means that persons gain knowledge from anyone around them. Would this signify an individual's behaviour can change by connection to several folk?